If indeed everything is relative and there is no truth in art, art must have no laws. But the problem with stating
this is that it becomes a law. If it is in the nature of artists to not conform and break the laws then in return will it be the nature of artists to break this law by making art laws? I doubt it but it’s an interesting thought.
Funny thing is I was talking to my wife about this all being a circular philosophical argument and that possibly nothing was really achieved through this process. I told her I might have enjoyed being a philosophy major instead of an art major. That to me there is no end process or conclusion to these conversations where we reach our final destination. That to me it’s the journey along the way where we learn bit by bit a little more about each other. To me my limits of tolerance and compromise have been strengthened and I find real value in that.
What say you?